The Quiet Collapse of Strategy

---

Military strategy is the planning and execution of the political and military goals of a nation or an alliance of nations with the use of military forces. It involves the development of plans to manage military resources and direct military operations in a way that supports the achievement of political objectives. The context of military strategy refers to the various political, economic, social, and military factors that influence the development and implementation of military strategy. Understanding the context of military strategy is critical to the successful planning and execution of military operations.

1. Political context: This refers to the political goals and objectives of a nation or an alliance of nations, which serve as the basis for military strategy. It also includes the political considerations that influence the use of military force, such as international treaties and agreements, domestic public opinion, and the potential impact of military operations on regional stability.

2. Economic context: This refers to the economic resources available to support military operations, including funding, personnel, equipment, and supplies. It also includes the impact of military operations on the national economy, such as the cost of maintaining and supporting military forces, as well as the economic impact of military action on allied and adversary nations.

3. Social context: This refers to the social and cultural norms and values of a society and how they influence military strategy. For example, the values and beliefs of the population can impact the level of support for military operations and the political objectives they are designed to achieve.

4. Military context: This refers to the military capabilities and limitations of a nation or alliance of nations, including the size, composition, and training of military forces, as well as the availability of weapons systems and other military equipment. It also includes the strategic environment, such as the presence of other military forces in the area, and the potential for conflict with other nations or alliances.

In summary, the context of military strategy includes a wide range of political, economic, social, and military factors that must be taken into account in the development and implementation of military strategy. Understanding the context of military strategy is essential for making informed decisions about the use of military force and for achieving military and political objectives. 

What theories and practices are used by the military

Military strategy is influenced by many factors such as geopolitical, economic, and technological considerations, as well as the capabilities and limitations of the military forces involved. Some of the key theories and practices used by the military include the principles of war, such as objective, offensive, defensive, mass, economy of force, maneuver, and surprise, and the operational art, which involves the application of military resources to achieve strategic goals, as well as the study of military history and the use of strategy frameworks (such as the OODA loop or the Joint Operational Framework).

What theories are used by both the military and businesses in strategy.

Both the military and businesses use strategy to achieve their objectives. In the business world, strategy is concerned with the development of plans to allocate resources and coordinate actions to achieve the goals of an organization. Some of the key theories used in business strategy include Porter's Five Forces, the Resource-Based View, and the Business Model Canvas.

Theories used by both the military and businesses in strategy include:

1. SWOT analysis: an evaluation of an organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.

2. Competitive advantage: a unique advantage an organization has over its competitors that allows it to create value for customers.

3. Resource allocation: the process of determining how resources should be distributed within an organization to achieve its objectives.

4. Risk management: the process of identifying, assessing, and prioritizing risks and taking actions to minimize their impact.

5. Game theory: the mathematical study of decision-making and strategic behavior.

6. Decision making under uncertainty: the process of making decisions when there is limited information or when the outcome is uncertain.

7. Situational awareness: understanding the current state of the environment and its potential impact on the organization's objectives.

These theories are used by both military and business strategies to analyse the environment, understand the objectives, and allocate resources in order to make decisions and achieve success. However, the specific implementation and application of these theories may differ depending on the context and nature of the organization. 

Compare and contrast these strategies used by both military and businesses.

The main difference between military and business strategy is the nature of the objectives and the environment in which they are executed. Military strategy is focused on achieving political objectives through the use of military force, while business strategy is focused on achieving commercial objectives through the allocation of resources and the development of products and services. Military strategy operates in an environment characterized by risk, uncertainty, and rapid change, while business strategy operates in a more stable and predictable environment.

Comparing and contrasting military and business strategies:

1. Objectives: The primary objective of military strategy is to achieve political goals through the use of military force, while the primary objective of business strategy is to achieve economic goals and increase shareholder value.

2. Context: Military strategy operates in a high-stakes, high-risk environment where decisions can have immediate and far-reaching consequences, while business strategy operates in a more predictable and controllable environment.

3. Environment: Military strategy must take into account a range of factors such as geopolitical, economic, and social conditions, while business strategy focuses primarily on market conditions and competition.

4. Resource allocation: Military strategy focuses on the allocation of military resources, such as personnel and weapons systems, while business strategy focuses on the allocation of financial and human resources.

5. Risk management: Military strategy must address the risk of loss of life and mission failure, while business strategy must address financial risks and potential losses.

6. Decision making: Military strategy often involves making decisions under conditions of extreme uncertainty and time pressure, while business strategy typically allows for more time to gather and analyse information before making decisions.

7. Flexibility: Military strategy must be flexible to adapt to changing conditions on the battlefield, while business strategy must be flexible to respond to changes in the market.

Overall, military and business strategies share some similarities in their approaches to situation analysis, resource allocation, and risk management, but the nature of their objectives, context, and environments make them distinct from one another.

Military speak and use of Command & Control is still being researched to its effective and capabilities in military commands in the UK. Here is a definition of Command & Control:

Niven G, Dstl, UK (2021) The Anatomy of Command and Control: A Generic Functional Model.

Definition: 

“Command: the authority vested in member of the armed forces for the direction, coordination, and control of military forces.”

“Control: the authority exercised by a commander over part of the activities of subordinate organisations, or other organisations not normally under his command, that encompasses the responsibility for implementing orders or directives.”

Why such a focal point on Command & Control? 

A company, organisations have structures that operates like a military command have an organisational chart with a CEO as the head of the organisation. In a military command has a General or Commander only then it is given the title Command.

A context to Command & Control (C2) a dynamic and adaptive methodological process to design and execute shared action, whose purpose is to provide focus for people and organisations so they may integrate and expand their resource and activities to achieve desired actions. There are comparisons Command and Control that businesses could build to enabling strategy direction knowing the complexities businesses tackle to identify capabilities and resources, these are analytical to a CEO to understanding strategy design to its strategic actions.

A baseline for Command and Control is adopting military laser thinking on capability. A firm’s capability or competence is the capacity of a firm to perform internal activities competently. Capabilities are established and enabled through the deployment of companies’ resources. 

Military laser thinking for capabilities: a forceful and adaptive methodology to design and execute joint actions. Encompasses essential functions, to creating shared awareness also responsiveness of command intention. Knowing allocation of resource to create effective assessing progress, recognising a firm to change approach to command and control. The plan of action. 

Management is a collection of functions performed on behalf of an organisation, and the term also refers to specific groups of people whose main role is to perform these functions. Management has history from military training which involves periodic reflection and reassessment of tactics and behaviours. 

This has given rise to learning of:

· Behavioural Theory of the Firm

· Competing Values Framework

· Competitive Advantage

· Diversification Strategy

· Firm Growth

· Goal Setting Theory